I’m impressed with the inclusion happening inMarried at First Sightseason 19, and I think the two new casting twists mean the show is headed in a new direction.Married at First Sightpremiered in 2014, andseason 18 finished airingin March 2025. This left fans on a hiatus from the show, and I know hiatuses last 4–6 months. What may factor into a potentially shorter hiatus, is thatMAFSis switching networks from Lifetime to the streaming giant, Peacock. Also, seasons ofMAFStend to air four five to six once they begin, which could also change.
Married at First Sightseason 19’s weddings were filmed in February 2024, so it’s been more than a year since the couples got married. It is customary forMAFSto have the seasons air the drama that happened more than a year in the past. And while I don’t like it, the speed at which seasons are produced could get faster under Peacock. Regardless of the filming schedule,season 19 will have the most inclusive cast ever, and I’m excited by the upcoming twists, as the show needs to trend differently and adopt new norms amidyears of low-success seasons.
MAFS Has Historically Cast A Certain Demographic
Twenties & Early Thirties
The reason I say thatMarried at First SIghtis coming off of years of low-success seasons is that the percentage of successful matches has been so poor. Of the 69 couples matched by the experts in the last 10+ years, only 13 of them are still together. I think this is in large part due to the casting demographic thatMAFSproduction employs.Married at First Sightuses two strategies to select participants. The first is through organic applications, meaning people who seek out becoming cast members themselves and apply.
The second casting approachMAFSproduction uses is through scouting and recruiting.Producers scour dating apps and Instagram profiles in the placesMAFSvisits in order to find telegenic people who they then invite to apply for the show. I feel the second method leaves too much room for clout chasers or people who aren’t ready for marriage to get through the process in order to be on TV. Despite my thoughts on the casting approach, this is how production has always done it.
Within that matrix, I’ve noticedMarried at First Sighthas notoriously sought a certain demographic of participants. I’ve found most of the cast members to be in their late twenties to early thirties, with some mid-twenties and late thirties people thrown in.
I don’t see that this target demographic has done any favors for the show.
While I realize they are seeking a marriage-ready demographic, I don’t think casting considers life experience when choosing participants.
InMAFSseason 16, Domynique Kloss was only 25, yet she preached that she was an"old soul"ready for marriage. In fact, she clearly was not, as she never gave her husband a chance. Moreover, in season 17, 29-year-old Emily Balch had never been in a relationship before, and her immaturity in that area showed. There have been some older exceptions to the cast age choices. In season 18, Thomas McDonald was 42, and Ikechi Ojoré was 41, but only Thomas had a successful marriage. Given Thomas' age and life experience, I see thatthe older demographic worked.
MAFS Season 19 Will Have Two Casting Twists
Including A Mother-Daughter Duo
Married at First Sightseason 19 will break from the usual and tired age range that hasn’t produced lasting couples. According toMAFSfan and spoiler account@mafsfan, season 19 will have a couple, Belynda and Chad, who are in their late forties/early fifties, and another, even older couple, Rhonda and Patric, who are in their late fifties/early sixties. I am overjoyed by the prospect of older couples getting married to strangers.
It’s something the show has never done before, and it is an exciting twist that opens the show up to new possibilities. Not only will older participants bring a different set of baggage, hopes, and emotional intelligence thatMAFShas been lacking, but I feel the break from the norm is refreshing. Moreover, one of the older women will be on the show with her daughter, in the first-ever mother-daughter duo. I find both twists to be highly engaging and tantalizing, as they breathe new life into the possibility that the outcomes could be different, since the demographic is changing.
MAFS Is Moving Towards Inclusion
Less Ageism
The other point about expanding theMAFSage range higher that I want to make, is that it means the hit reality show is trending towards inclusion. With huge successes like ABC’sGoldenfranchise and Netflix’sThe Later Daters,MAFSis picking up on reality TV trends and alsostriving to mix things up and break into perhaps an older audience along with it.
I’m all for less ageism onMarried at First Sight, and I think season 19 is pioneering in that way, and it bodes well for how future casting could go.
MAFS Should Be Making Major Changes
The Show Needs An Overhaul
I wholeheartedly believe the changes made to casting older participants arenecessary for the show’s reception and trajectoryat this point.Married at First Sighthas become stale because of the failure rate, and spicing the cast up with a new age range and couples you can root for in a different way, I think, is the way to go. The show needed an overhaul, and it’s getting one. I’m excited because I think future seasons past season 19 will have more varied age ranges, which can draw in more viewers and give the current audience more to consider.
Late 20s
Early 30s
Late 50s or Early 60s
Late 40s or Early 50s
Late 30s
